This is my own validation car, running on the real T800 pipeline every morning.
Not a mockup, not a demo — real CAN telemetry, with customer-facing monitors and validation-only monitors shown side by side.
Loading latest report…
259-Day History
259 days of one Tesla, watched every day
The cards above are today. This is the run behind them: the same four systems, decoded from this car's own CAN bus every day since Jan 1, 2026, with no gaps. A used Tesla's real condition is a trend, not a test-drive — a single reading can't tell a healthy pack from a failing one, but 259 of them can. Data delayed — showing the last verified run.
259
consecutive days logged, zero gaps
-1.4%
average brick capacity change
+67
equivalent full cycles in the window
0
alerts from 3 rejected junk frames (HV isolation)
Battery — usable capacity
Average brick CAC in amp-hours, one point per day: the mean computed capacity across brick groups (the weakest group and imbalance are tracked separately). The axis is zoomed to the data, spanning about 5 Ah, so the shape is legible; the decline is real but gentle. Capacity is one piece of evidence, read with cell balance, cycles and temperature — never a standalone "battery life %".
Battery — HV isolation, and why we don't cry wolf
Pack-to-chassis isolation. The daily median sits at the reported ceiling of 5.16 MOhm essentially every day; the daily minimum swings through a healthy band. Across the whole run, exactly three single frames came back near zero — junk frames, not faults. A monitor that alarmed on the worst sample would have failed this pack three times; t800 gates on persistence, so it raised zero alerts.
Air suspension — watching for a slow leak
Ride-height drift while parked, in mm per hour, common-mode removed so it isolates one corner sagging rather than the whole car settling with temperature. Day to day it is noisy; the solid line is the 7-day median. A developing air-strut or valve leak shows up as that trend rising on one corner and staying up, long before a dashboard warning. So far it has not.
Low-voltage power (DC-DC)
DC-DC converter efficiency — how well the car tops up its 12V from the HV pack. This measures the conversion path that supports the 12V system, not the resting health of the 12V battery itself. A visible step-down begins in spring and holds; we are monitoring it, and this chart alone does not identify the cause. No validated resting-voltage series is shown here — t800 does not pass off awake charging voltage as a true sleep-state reading.
Historical trends are temporarily unavailable. Today's report above is unaffected.
How this works
What you're looking at
Each morning at 4:35 AM, T800 runs a full health analysis on the previous day's CAN bus data.
It produces this report. This page uses the same reporting system as the customer product, but on my own car we also expose monitors that are still under active validation.
Current monitor status
This report currently shows five customer-facing subsystems — Air Suspension, HV Battery Pack,
12V System, Charging System, and Thermal Management — ordered by failure cost. Two were promoted
from validation-only to live product cards after clearing internal review: Air Suspension on
May 8, 2026 (with its limited_data / monitoring / attention / service_suggested state machine),
and Thermal Management on Jul 28, 2026 after a 208-day validation. One more, Energy Efficiency,
is still being calibrated and doesn't affect the overall status.
What "Monitoring" means
A single day's reading outside the normal range changes nothing you see here — it's logged and
watched silently, not surfaced. A customer-facing system moves to "Monitoring" only once the drift
persists across several of the last seven days: not alarming, just flagging that we're now tracking
it and confirming before it means anything. Validation-only monitors can surface earlier without
affecting the overall status. That's how the report stays honest about uncertainty — without crying
wolf on a single supercharge or hard drive.